The legal implications of aerial bombardment are complex and significant, involving international humanitarian law and war crime considerations. In the aftermath of aerial attacks, such as those in Gaza, legal analysis focuses on whether these actions comply with the principles of distinction, proportionality, and military necessity. These principles govern the legality of targeting and the protection of civilians and civilian objects. As warfare evolves, so do the legal frameworks that seek to regulate it, aiming to balance military objectives with the protection of human rights and civilian lives.